# RESEARCH SUBMISSION

RESEARCH SUBMISSION

The 5th Rural Extension and Development Colloquium WILL RECEIVE SCIENTIFIC WORKS AND EXPERIENCE REPORTS, arising from scientific research (ongoing or completed) and which have as their object of analysis associated issues, such as: problems, contexts, trends, changes, or other approaches that are relate to the theme of the event and the Working Group (GT). With the intention of contributing through the event, relevant scientific constructions in terms of quality, breadth and plurality.


Submissions must be in WORD format (or similar) and can be submitted BETWEEN September 17, 2023 and the 25th October 2023 (Extended until November 5, 2023). Through the same registration link, https://evento.nte.ufsm.br/5coloquioppgexr/register

Each submission may have a maximum of 04 (four) authors, and each author may appear in a maximum of 2 (two) submissions, either as main author or co-author. And submissions must be unpublished and may come from theoretical and/or practical research, completed or in progress, relating to the thematic areas of the following Working Groups (GT1; GT2 or GT3):

THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE OF THE 5TH COLLOQUIUM ADVISES YOU TO DOWNLOAD THE TEMPLATE TO MAKE INSERTS ON YOUR COMPUTER AND NOT ON THE ORGANIZATION'S DRIVE 

For submissions in WORD (or similar), authors must pay attention to the fact that there are two formats, one being a FILE WITH the authors' characterizations (full NAME; linked INSTITUTION; LOCATION of origin; and EMAIL for contact).



And another FILE WITHOUT identification or any other form that allows them to be identified, otherwise the submission will be rejected. But in this case (before the committee sends it to the evaluators), the authors will be notified and will be able to submit again, if there is enough time to do so.



After the Scientific Committee receives the evaluation of the submissions by the double-blind reviewers, a report will be sent to the authors about the decision, with 03 (three) possibilities for deciding on the research submitted. : “ACCEPT” or “REJECT” the submission, according to the schedule. And the other is if the submission is “ACCEPTED WITH CORRECTIONS”, while it is still within the submission deadline, these proponents will be able to resubmit the research with the corrections, but if it is not resubmitted, it will be automatically excluded from the list of approved submissions.

Survey submissions are free. However, if the proposal is approved for presentation, one of the authors must pay the SUBMISSION fee.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that at the time of submission, you must also attach the Copyright and Image Rights Declaration document in PDF, with the signature (in words or digitally through the GOV system if available) of the authors. 



  1. Submission Rules

Submissions (Scientific Works and Experience Reports) must follow the ABNT formatting rules (detailed in the template), in accordance with the ABNT NBR 10520 rules on the format of citations; ABNT NBR 6022 for scientific research; ABNT NBR 6028 on abstract characteristics (description after the research title). Therefore, according to the template mentioned above, the research submitted must contain:

a. Title in Portuguese and English;

b. Summary and Abstract with a minimum of 150 and a maximum of 250 words;

c. Keywords, between a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5.

d. A4 format, with margins: Top: 3 cm; bottom: 2 cm; left: 3 cm; right: 2 cm; Times New Roman font; size 12, line spacing 1.5 (note that in some sections it will be single spacing of 1.0), text with justified alignment and paragraph 1.25.

e. The size of scientific works and experience reports will be a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 10 pages, including all content from the title to bibliographic references.

f. Suggested structure: submitted research must contain an introduction; literature review/theoretical framework (optional); methodological procedures; analysis of results; final considerations/conclusion and bibliographic references.

g. Citations and bibliographic references must follow the norms and standards structured by ABNT (as mentioned).

h. At the time of submission, authors must choose the thematic area GT1, GT2 or GT3 (according to item 4).


The Organizing Committee of the 5th Colloquium is not responsible for any cases of plagiarism, such as charges incurred by third parties in relation to the authorship of the submitted (accepted) research that will be published in the event's e-book, being the full responsibility of the authors/ to the.


  1. Rating criteria

The evaluation process will be double-blind. The evaluators will send opinions to the Scientific Committee with the intention of justifying the approval or disapproval of the document, which will be passed on to the authors. This bridge carried out by the commission aims to maintain discretion on both sides (those who evaluate and those who submit) to avoid any question of favoritism.

The Scientific Committee understands that the choice of the appropriate methodology derives from an adequate definition of the research topic, implying a good understanding and description of the data obtained. And the results must be adequately discussed and must highlight their contributions to understanding reality and theoretical improvement.


Table – Criteria and Descriptions for Evaluators:

RATING CRITERIA

DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITERIA

1) Adherence to the thematic area (GT)

The content of the submission adheres to the chosen thematic area (GT). Authors are expected to select a thematic area (GT) that is aligned with the predominant area of ​​knowledge of their work.

2) Contribution and importance: for the line of research and the theme of the GT.

Does the title express what is presented in the text? Does the submission bring new contributions/innovations in empirical/methodological/theoretical terms)? Contextualize adequately the contributions of the study in relation to the published literature? Evaluate criteria considering items such as title, summary and introduction.

3) Methodology: adequacy and correct description of the research and analysis methodology

Are the study design and methods (collection and analysis of data and information) described clearly and appropriately? Is the time frame described and justified? Is there justification for the scientific validity and/or reliability of the methodology? Are there enough details that would allow the research to be replicated? Does the Method imply evaluation by an ethics committee?

4) Results and discussion: Quality of results and discussion

Is the data analyzed based on the proposed methodology/theory? Is there precision and clarity in the presentation/analysis of results? Was all relevant data included or was its absence justified?

5) Bibliographic references: Relevance, scope and, if possible, current

Are the references considered relevant and comprehensive to support contributions to the state of the art of the research topic?

6) Quality of text writing as a whole

Is the text appropriately/logically structured? Is the language appropriate, correct and meets the standards of scientific research?

Source: PPGEXR (2023).


Disapproved submissions will NOT be subject to appeal.
Submissão de Trabalhos

De 15/09/2023 até 16/11/2023

Submissão de Trabalhos

De 27/10/2023 até 25/11/2023

Submissão de Trabalhos

De 27/10/2023 até 16/11/2023